Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Explanations for worsening cancer survival

  • Esther De Vries
  • , Henrike E. Karim-Kos
  • , Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen
  • , Isabelle Soerjomataram
  • , Lambertus A. Kiemeney
  • , Jan Willem W. Coebergh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

If cancer survival is reported to be worsening over time or inferior compared to other countries, politicians and health-care workers may get blamed because suboptimal care is presumed to be the cause. Yet, a variety of reasons exist for cancer survival statistics to change for the worse, of which deterioration of care is only one. Another explanation is that the improved diagnosis of premalignant lesions causes survival statistics to reflect only the most aggressive cancers-those with the poorest prognosis. In addition, deleterious changes in the distribution of prognostic factors and in the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics may negatively affect survival proportions. In this article, we identify the pitfalls that might be encountered in comparisons of published, population-based survival data from different time periods or populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-63
Number of pages4
JournalNature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explanations for worsening cancer survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this