El estancamiento de la controversia sobre el seleccionismo génico

Translated title of the contribution: The Stagnation of the Controversy About Gene Selection

Julián D. Bohórquez-Carvajal, Reinaldo J. Bernal-Velásquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We address the scientific controversy about the plausibility of gene selection theory. First, we show that this controversy seems to be at a standstill as a whole and in particular regarding the central issue: whether genes are the unit of natural selection. Secondly, we claim that the standstill regarding this issue can be explained largely because the contending parties conceive genetics in different ways. Finally, we argue that the controversy could move forward if the highly problematic question of how to define “gene”, that has been neglected despite its relevance.

Translated title of the contributionThe Stagnation of the Controversy About Gene Selection
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)66-88
Number of pages23
JournalIdeas y Valores
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Stagnation of the Controversy About Gene Selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this