Abstract
Firms statistically discriminate (redline) against job candidates based on where they live. We conducted a correspondence test by sending three identical fictitious resumes to every non-professional job offer posted in two main job vacancy newspapers in Bogota. The only difference between the resumes was the residential address in which the applicants lived. Two of the three resumes sent in each trio were located with the same commuting time (and geographical distance) from the job, but one resided in a low-crime neighborhood and the other in a high-crime neighborhood. The third resume was for a fictitious individual located in a low-crime neighborhood that was further away (longer commuting time and greater distance). We find that employers statistically discriminate (redline) based on commuting time to work. In particular, living a half-hour away from the vacancy reduces the callback rate by 14 percent while holding the attributes of the place of residence constant. We did not find evidence that employers respond to neighborhood effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103541 |
| Journal | Regional Science and Urban Economics |
| Volume | 83 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Correspondence test
- Employment
- Neighborhood effects
- Productivity
- Spatial mismatch
- Statistical discrimination
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do firms redline workers?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver