Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do firms redline workers?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Firms statistically discriminate (redline) against job candidates based on where they live. We conducted a correspondence test by sending three identical fictitious resumes to every non-professional job offer posted in two main job vacancy newspapers in Bogota. The only difference between the resumes was the residential address in which the applicants lived. Two of the three resumes sent in each trio were located with the same commuting time (and geographical distance) from the job, but one resided in a low-crime neighborhood and the other in a high-crime neighborhood. The third resume was for a fictitious individual located in a low-crime neighborhood that was further away (longer commuting time and greater distance). We find that employers statistically discriminate (redline) based on commuting time to work. In particular, living a half-hour away from the vacancy reduces the callback rate by 14 percent while holding the attributes of the place of residence constant. We did not find evidence that employers respond to neighborhood effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103541
JournalRegional Science and Urban Economics
Volume83
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Correspondence test
  • Employment
  • Neighborhood effects
  • Productivity
  • Spatial mismatch
  • Statistical discrimination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do firms redline workers?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this