Abstract
Candidemia is a disease with high morbidity and mortality especially in critical care patients. Early diagnosis enables early treatment. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to establish the best laboratory tests for the diagnosis of candidemia in critical patients. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of available literature in PubMed. Serological studies were subjected to meta-analysis in metadisk-Beta 1.1.1. Results: 4 studies of 1286 reviewed were included. Three were about serological tests and one about molecular testing (RT-PCR). The sensitivity and specificity for RT-PCR, antibody testing and antigen and antibody tests were 87% and 100%, 47.5% and 82.6%, 96% and 81%, respectively. Diagnostic Odds Ratio of antigenemia was 1.51 (95% CI = 0,032-70,964, p = 0.001). Conclusions: RT-PCR has better diagnostic performance, measuring antigenemia plus antibodies improves sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR-¬. There is insufficient evidence to support this.
| Translated title of the contribution | Métodos diagnósticos en candidemia: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura con meta-análisis |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 423-428 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Revista Chilena de Infectologia |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Candidemia
- Fungemia
- Molecular diagnostic techniques
- Serology
- Systematic reviews
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic methods in candidemia: A systematic review of literature with meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver