Diagnostic methods in candidemia: A systematic review of literature with meta-analysis

Jorge Alberto Cortés, M. Alejandro Concha, T. Luis Eduardo Cediel, Juan Sebastián Castillo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Candidemia is a disease with high morbidity and mortality especially in critical care patients. Early diagnosis enables early treatment. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to establish the best laboratory tests for the diagnosis of candidemia in critical patients. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of available literature in PubMed. Serological studies were subjected to meta-analysis in metadisk-Beta 1.1.1. Results: 4 studies of 1286 reviewed were included. Three were about serological tests and one about molecular testing (RT-PCR). The sensitivity and specificity for RT-PCR, antibody testing and antigen and antibody tests were 87% and 100%, 47.5% and 82.6%, 96% and 81%, respectively. Diagnostic Odds Ratio of antigenemia was 1.51 (95% CI = 0,032-70,964, p = 0.001). Conclusions: RT-PCR has better diagnostic performance, measuring antigenemia plus antibodies improves sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR-¬. There is insufficient evidence to support this.

Translated title of the contributionMétodos diagnósticos en candidemia: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura con meta-análisis
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-428
Number of pages6
JournalRevista Chilena de Infectologia
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Candidemia
  • Fungemia
  • Molecular diagnostic techniques
  • Serology
  • Systematic reviews

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic methods in candidemia: A systematic review of literature with meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this