Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Derrida y Foucault: Ciencias humanas, estructuralismo y tradición filosófica

Translated title of the contribution: Foucault and Derrida: Human Sciences, Structuralism and Philosophic Tradition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Context: Despite their differences, Derrida and Foucault were part of a generation of intellectuals concerned with the nature of the human sciences. This shared concern is one of several points of convergence we present in relation to two texts: “The Human Sciences,” the final chapter of The Order of Things by Foucault, and “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences” by Derrida.

Methodology: A textual analysis of these works, supported by a few additional sources, allows us to highlight the connection between the two authors based on their inquiry into (1) the future of the human sciences and (2) their shared expectation of the arrival of an event within the order of knowledge.

Conclusions: Around these two themes, we point to a methodological convergence between the authors. Already in the 1960s, though in very different ways, Foucault and Derrida coincide in recognizing the exhaustion of reflections centered on language and in their critique of the “philosophical tradition.” Additionally, the texts discussed allow us to identify, from a present-day perspective, affinities between their work and posthumanism, as well as with situated, decolonial, and other currents of contemporary thought
Translated title of the contributionFoucault and Derrida: Human Sciences, Structuralism and Philosophic Tradition
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalPRAXIS FILOSÓFICA
Volume1
Issue number62
DOIs
StatePublished - 05 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Human Sciences
  • Posthumanism
  • Derrida
  • Foucault
  • Language
  • Structuralism
  • Event

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foucault and Derrida: Human Sciences, Structuralism and Philosophic Tradition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this