Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the difference costs considering a third-party payer perspective in patients with complicated urinary tract infection between a hospital-level home care service and standard hospitalization.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study, retrieving medical records of patients with complicated urinary tract infection diagnosis treated at a fourth-level hospital, from January 2017 to May 2020. A linear regression model was obtained to evaluate cost per day attention determinants.
Results: 239 patients were included in the hospitalized group and 68 in the hospital-level home care group. The in-hospital cohort was older (median 71 vs 59 years, p=0.002). There were no differences in 30-day mortality rate (2.1% vs 5.9%, p=0.114) or total costs of attention (Colombian pesos (COP) 8767141 vs 9558334, p= 0.112). A longer clinical attention (median 17 vs 12 days, p<0.001) and a lower cost/day were found in patients hospitalized at home (COP 756100 vs 554685, p<0.001).The following factors were associated with increased cost/day: hospital-level home care (COP –209155, p=0.01), Charlson index ≥6 (COP 26250, p=0.001), surgical procedures (COP 368157, p<0.001), Intensive Care Unit requirement (COP 373927, p<0.001), subsidized regimen (COP 209156, p=0.013), staphylococcus isolation (COP 1252473, p<0.001) and carbapenemase-producing germs (COP 629319, p<0.001).
Conclusions: This study suggests that cost/day attention for patients with complicated urinary tract infection is lower in patient treated by a hospital-level home service. However, the total costs are similar. Additionally, hospital-level home service is secure.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study, retrieving medical records of patients with complicated urinary tract infection diagnosis treated at a fourth-level hospital, from January 2017 to May 2020. A linear regression model was obtained to evaluate cost per day attention determinants.
Results: 239 patients were included in the hospitalized group and 68 in the hospital-level home care group. The in-hospital cohort was older (median 71 vs 59 years, p=0.002). There were no differences in 30-day mortality rate (2.1% vs 5.9%, p=0.114) or total costs of attention (Colombian pesos (COP) 8767141 vs 9558334, p= 0.112). A longer clinical attention (median 17 vs 12 days, p<0.001) and a lower cost/day were found in patients hospitalized at home (COP 756100 vs 554685, p<0.001).The following factors were associated with increased cost/day: hospital-level home care (COP –209155, p=0.01), Charlson index ≥6 (COP 26250, p=0.001), surgical procedures (COP 368157, p<0.001), Intensive Care Unit requirement (COP 373927, p<0.001), subsidized regimen (COP 209156, p=0.013), staphylococcus isolation (COP 1252473, p<0.001) and carbapenemase-producing germs (COP 629319, p<0.001).
Conclusions: This study suggests that cost/day attention for patients with complicated urinary tract infection is lower in patient treated by a hospital-level home service. However, the total costs are similar. Additionally, hospital-level home service is secure.
| Translated title of the contribution | Costs of hospital-level home care vs. in-hospital care in complicated urinary tract infection |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Revista Gerencia y Politicas de Salud |
| Volume | 22 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 31 Mar 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- urinary tract infections
- home health care services
- health care economics and organizations
- cost and cost analysis
- Colombia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Costs of hospital-level home care vs. in-hospital care in complicated urinary tract infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver