Abstract
In the original publication of this article [1], an incorrect description of the IFCC Working Group on CGM recommendations was included in Results sections. The incorrect and correct description are displayed below: In Results section, under fifth paragraph of “Rationale” heading, the sentence should read, “In line with the IFCC Working Group on CGM [16], at least 7.5% of all values should cover each of the following situations: BG< 70 mg/dL; BG>300 mg/dL; BG≥ 70 mg/dL with rate of change < –1 mg/dL/min or BG < 70 mg/dL within 30 minutes at the current rate of change; and BG ≤ 300 mg/dL with rate of change >+1.5 mg/dL/min or BG >250 mg/dL within 30 minutes at the current rate of change” instead of “In line with the IFCC Working Group on CGM, at least 20% of paired samples should be obtained within each predefined rate-of-change stratum (≤ 1, 1–2, and >2 mg dL⁻¹ min⁻¹) [16]”. The original article has been corrected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 436 |
| Pages (from-to) | 436 |
| Journal | Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 20 Nov 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin america: an expert approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver