Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction: Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin america: an expert approach

  • Mauro Scharf
  • , Karen Feriz
  • , Carlos Yepes
  • , Álvaro Contreras
  • , Lorena Lequi
  • , David Sanhueza
  • , Marcio Krakauer
  • , Eduardo Márquez
  • , Matías Ré
  • , Roopa Mehta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the original publication of this article [1], an incorrect description of the IFCC Working Group on CGM recommendations was included in Results sections. The incorrect and correct description are displayed below: In Results section, under fifth paragraph of “Rationale” heading, the sentence should read, “In line with the IFCC Working Group on CGM [16], at least 7.5% of all values should cover each of the following situations: BG< 70 mg/dL; BG>300 mg/dL; BG≥ 70 mg/dL with rate of change < –1 mg/dL/min or BG < 70 mg/dL within 30 minutes at the current rate of change; and BG ≤ 300 mg/dL with rate of change >+1.5 mg/dL/min or BG >250 mg/dL within 30 minutes at the current rate of change” instead of “In line with the IFCC Working Group on CGM, at least 20% of paired samples should be obtained within each predefined rate-of-change stratum (≤ 1, 1–2, and >2 mg dL⁻¹ min⁻¹) [16]”. The original article has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish
Article number436
Pages (from-to)436
JournalDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Nov 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin america: an expert approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this