Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

Carlos Andres Devia; Johan Pena; Lizeth Roldan; Diego Patino

doi:10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

Carlos Andres Devia
, Johan Pena
, Lizeth Roldan
, Diego Patino

Department of Electronic Engineering

Universidad Javeriana

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings
Editors	Diego Patino, Eugenio Yime
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages	1-5
Number of pages	5
ISBN (Electronic)	9781538603987
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391
State	Published - 02 Jul 2017
Event	3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Cartagena, Colombia Duration: 18 Oct 2017 → 20 Oct 2017

Publication series

Name	2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings
Volume	2018-January

Conference

Conference	3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017
Country/Territory	Colombia
City	Cartagena
Period	18/10/17 → 20/10/17

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

Extremum-Seeking Control
Maximum Power Point Tracking
Model Free Optimization
Real-Time Optimization

Access to Document

10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Cite this

Devia, C. A., Pena, J., Roldan, L., & Patino, D. (2017). Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. In D. Patino, & E. Yime (Eds.), 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-5). (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings; Vol. 2018-January). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Devia, Carlos Andres ; Pena, Johan ; Roldan, Lizeth et al. / Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. editor / Diego Patino ; Eugenio Yime. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. pp. 1-5 (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings).

@inproceedings{ddb977efd6e948f69f09bf78a9cb1491,

title = "Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking",

abstract = "This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.",

keywords = "Extremum-Seeking Control, Maximum Power Point Tracking, Model Free Optimization, Real-Time Optimization",

author = "Devia, \{Carlos Andres\} and Johan Pena and Lizeth Roldan and Diego Patino",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 IEEE.; 3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 ; Conference date: 18-10-2017 Through 20-10-2017",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391",

language = "English",

series = "2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

pages = "1--5",

editor = "Diego Patino and Eugenio Yime",

booktitle = "2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings",

address = "United States",

}

Devia, CA, Pena, J, Roldan, L & Patino, D 2017, Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. in D Patino & E Yime (eds), 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings, vol. 2018-January, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 1-5, 3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017, Cartagena, Colombia, 18/10/17. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. / Devia, Carlos Andres; Pena, Johan; Roldan, Lizeth et al.
2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. ed. / Diego Patino; Eugenio Yime. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. p. 1-5 (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings; Vol. 2018-January).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

AU - Devia, Carlos Andres

AU - Pena, Johan

AU - Roldan, Lizeth

AU - Patino, Diego

PY - 2017/7/2

Y1 - 2017/7/2

N2 - This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.

AB - This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.

KW - Extremum-Seeking Control

KW - Maximum Power Point Tracking

KW - Model Free Optimization

KW - Real-Time Optimization

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047390579

U2 - 10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

DO - 10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85047390579

T3 - 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings

SP - 1

EP - 5

BT - 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings

A2 - Patino, Diego

A2 - Yime, Eugenio

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017

Y2 - 18 October 2017 through 20 October 2017

ER -

Devia CA, Pena J, Roldan L, Patino D. Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. In Patino D, Yime E, editors, 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2017. p. 1-5. (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings). doi: 10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this