Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of self-report versus accelerometer - measured physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their association with body composition in Latin American countries

  • on behalf of the ELANS Study Group
  • Universidad Mayor
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • International Life Science Institute (ILSI-Argentina)
  • Hospital Infantil Sabará
  • University of Costa Rica
  • Instituto Costarricense de Enseñanza e Investigación en Nutrición y Salud
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • San Francisco de Quito University
  • Instituto de Investigación Nutricional
  • Universidad Central de Venezuela
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of Coimbra
  • Statistics Canada
  • International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI)
  • University Isalud
  • Instituto Pensi-Hospital Infantil
  • Universidad Javeriana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Most population-based studies from Latin America have used questionnaires to measure physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB). Low reliability and validity of the questionnaires has limited the capacity to examine associations between PA and health. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported and accelerometer-measured PA and SB and their associations with body composition in Latin American countries. Methods Data were obtained from the Latin American Study of Nutrition and Health (aged 15-65 years), collected from September 2014 to February 2015. PA and SB were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (long version) and the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer. Outcomes of interest included: body mass index (BMI), waist (WC) and neck circumference (NC). We used the Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots, and multilevel linear regression models. Results Mean moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by accelerometer and IPAQ were 34.4 min/day (95% CI: 33.4 to 35.4) and 45.6 min/day (95% CI: 43.2 to 48.1), respectively. For SB (accelerometer and IPAQ) the means were 573.1 (95% CI: 568.2 to 577.9) and 231.9 min/day (95% CI: 225.5 to 238.3). MVPA, measured by the accelerometer was negatively associated with BMI (β = -1.95; 95% CI: -2.83 to -1.08), WC (β = -5.04; 95% CI: -7.18 to -2.89) and NC (β = -1.21; 95% CI: -1.79 to -0.63). The MVPA estimated through IPAQ was not significantly associated with any of the three outcome variables. SB, measured by the accelerometer, was positively associated with BMI (β = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.44) and WC (β = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.91). SB estimated through IPAQ was positively associated with NC only. Conclusions Low correlation coefficients were observed for accelerometer-derived and IPAQ-reported estimates of PA and SB. Caution is advised when making comparisons between accelerometer-measured and self-reported PA and SB. Further, studies examining associations between movement and health should discuss the impact of PA and SB measurement methodology on the results obtained.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0232420
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of self-report versus accelerometer - measured physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their association with body composition in Latin American countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this