Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Chronological versus dental age in subjects from 5 to 19 years: A comparative study with forensic implications

  • Claudia Corral
  • , Felipe García
  • , Jorge García
  • , Pilar León
  • , Adriana Herrera
  • , Carlos Martínez
  • , Freddy Moreno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated six methods used in estimating the age of patients attending the Dental School at Universidad del Valle, evaluating dental development by using panoramic radiographs. Additionally, the study determined the sexual identity of the person and the bilateral symmetry of development, the maturity and the chronological eruption of permanent teeth. Materials and methods: This is a descriptive, quantitative and transversal study that evaluated which of the six methods (Logan & Kronfeld; Schour & Massler; Moorrees, Fanning & Hunt; Demirjian, Goldstein & Tanner; Ubelaker & Smith) for estimating the age of a patient through radiographic evaluation of dental development is the most correlated with the chronological age of the patient, so it can be used for forensic purposes. Results: The Moorrees, Fanning & Hunt and the Smith methods showed high correlation (0.7874 and 0.7808, respectively). The Logan & Kronfeld methods presented low correlation (0.6879). The sample studied did not show sexual dimorphism or bilateral asymmetry. Conclusions: All methods evaluated have a high correlation coefficient between the dental age and the radiographic age. However, the Moorrees, Fanning & Hunt, and Smith methods presented higher correlation coefficients between dental and chronological age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-223
Number of pages9
JournalColombia Medica
Volume41
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Dental age
  • Forensic dentistry
  • Forensic sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chronological versus dental age in subjects from 5 to 19 years: A comparative study with forensic implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this