Abstract
This study presents a case analysis to identify differences in access to curative services among people affiliated to the contributive and subsidized system. At the population level, around a tenth of the population feels the need and demand a healing service, 97.8% being treated. Descriptive, cross-sectional investigation; fundamentals variables were operationalized taking into account the need serviced. Cases were considered, those presenting a health problem in the last month, consulted a formal service and were treated. The results show differences between the regimes of access and satisfaction; for example, in relation to the medicines they claimed 87.8% of contributive and subsidized 55.9%, statistically significant differences. Administrative and financial barriers were found; and characteristics of the services that affect access to care and quality in both regimes, demonstrating infringement of the fundamental right to health care.
| Translated title of the contribution | Access and satisfaction related to curative services: Case analysis of the contributory regime and members of the subsidized regime in a strata 2 neighborhood. Cali, Colombia |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 155-178 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Revista Gerencia y Politicas de Salud |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 29 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Access and satisfaction related to curative services: Case analysis of the contributory regime and members of the subsidized regime in a strata 2 neighborhood. Cali, Colombia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver