Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Academia in the throes of faceless bureaucracy

  • Jonathan Pansieri
  • , David Menassa
  • , Sandy Figiel
  • , Marco Pisa
  • , Andrew Lockhart
  • , Vito A.G. Ricigliano
  • , Meral Seferoglu
  • , Serena Borrelli
  • , Vitória Pimentel
  • , Nita Alpin
  • , Natalia Szejko
  • , Sara Samadzadeh
  • , Vinícius Boldrini
  • , Luis Zarco
  • , Edgar Patricio Correa-Díaz
  • , Jonadab Dos Santos Silva
  • , Enrique Gomez Figueroa
  • , Edgar Carnero Contentti
  • , Emine Rabia Koc
  • , Gloria Dalla Costa
  • Adriana Casallas-Vanegas, Christos Bakirtzis, Sanja Gluscevic, René Carvajal, Abdulkadir Tunç, Lukas Haider
  • University of Oxford
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • GHNE Saclay Hospital
  • APHP – Paris Saclay University
  • University of Health Sciences
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • University of Calgary
  • Medical University of Warsaw
  • Hannover Medical School
  • Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Nastved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals
  • IB. UNICAMP
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
  • Yale University
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense
  • Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
  • Hospital Alemán
  • CENRos
  • Uludag University
  • Harvard University
  • Universidad de la Sabana
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • University of Montenegro
  • Vall d’Hebron Hospital
  • Sakarya University
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

What is a researcher? This is a question we have asked ourselves
many times. Perhaps you have, too. Maybe you entered academia
believing, as we did, that scientists were creators of knowledge, developing ways to better understand the world and pass that knowledge on. Maybe you still hold on to that belief. The dream of being a
researcher, a career driven by critical thinking and translating findings into tangible benefits for society, competes with a far less inspiring reality: the creeping realization that bureaucracy has
taken hold of research, slowing it down, diluting its purpose and
burying it under administrative excess. It echoes the transformation in The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, where what was once
an identity becomes something unrecognizable.
This opinion represents the views of many early-career researchers lost in the system. It reflects a reality shared by all co-authors of
this article, who come from over 15 countries across four continents,
representing different fields and institutions. Bureaucracy consumes
valuable time and intellectual energy, hindering the work we trained
for, whether that is research or delivering the best possible care to patients. Every layer of administrative oversight intensifies the challenges we face, from securing funding and publishing research to
proving professional worth in a competitive environment or simply
maintaining the motivation to keep going.
As researchers and clinicians with diverse backgrounds and cumulatively many years of experience in academia, we have witnessed how bureaucracy suffocates the scientific workforce. And
if you read these lines, we suspect you have too. The corporatization
of academia has turned bureaucracy into a self-perpetuating system, diverting research funding into administrative expansion,
and increasing the gap between oversight and scientific goals.
Eventually, it prioritizes compliance over discovery. If you are reading this as a researcher, a clinician, a policymaker or even as someone outside of science, ask yourself: is this the system we want? In
this Opinion article, we share our perspective that academia can,
and must, be reclaimed from its administrative stranglehold.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3039-3042
Number of pages4
JournalBrain
Volume148
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 09 Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Academia in the throes of faceless bureaucracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this